What describes behavior that is wrong by both authorities and the individual, yet is performed regardless?

The concept of Type II Ethics describes behavior that is recognized as wrong by both the authorities and the individual, yet it is still carried out. This type of ethics addresses the conflict between personal morals and societal or organizational regulations. Individuals may understand that their actions are ethically or socially unacceptable but may still choose to engage in such behavior due to various pressures, temptations, or rationalizations.

In a workplace context, this can manifest in actions such as circumventing company rules or engaging in unethical practices while fully aware that these actions contradict both personal ethics and official policies. This distinctive understanding helps differentiate it from other ethical frameworks, where the motivations or understandings of wrongness may differ.

Type I Ethics, by contrast, typically pertains to situations where individuals may not recognize the behavior as wrong, and Behavioral Ethics focuses more on how individuals behave in ethical situations rather than the acknowledgment of wrongdoing. Standard Ethics often refers to common moral principles rather than the specific acknowledgment of wrongdoing in the context of individual versus authority views. Thus, Type II Ethics effectively encapsulates the dual recognition of wrongdoing yet persistent engagement in that behavior.